JavaScript required

Let It Be...Naked

  • LENNON!MCCARTNEY!

    LENNON!MCCARTNEY! on 23rd May 10:

    hihi

  • swater96

    swater96 on 24th Apr 10:

    @ RizkyPermanaBeatleMania.

    Because girls would much rather buy this album, the name makes their dream come true.

  • RizkyPermanaBeatleMania

    RizkyPermanaBeatleMania on 15th Apr 10:

    i was wondering why should they add "... Naked" on the the title. Why don't use a remastered or something...

  • FabFourObsesser6270

    FabFourObsesser6270 on 27th Mar 10:

    This is way better than the original Let It Be (in my mind). It is actually the album Get Back (for all of you who didn't know that). I thought I liked the Long and Winding Road that was on the "original" LIB... This version is the best. The sound quality is amazing on it too

  • WildHoneyPie.

    WildHoneyPie. on 20th Mar 10:

    So infinitely better than the original Let It Be. Phil Spector totally messed that up on the post production, with all his orchestration. This was Let It Be as the Beatles originally intended, and it's better for it.

  • tommybeck

    tommybeck on 18th Mar 10:

    The original album was remixed by Phil Spector, who added lots of orchestral arrangements and other stuff. This one has been stripped of the overdubs, hence the title

  • paulmccartneylover

    paulmccartneylover on 8th Mar 10:

    What did they can from let it be

  • efren59

    efren59 on 28th Feb 10:

    yhe color is negitive

  • samuelbeatlesfan101

    samuelbeatlesfan101 on 11th Feb 10:

    I'm not so fine with the titie, shouldn't it be something more appropiate.

  • BEATLES_FREAK579

    BEATLES_FREAK579 on 11th Feb 10:

    I love all of you guys who are Beatles fans but im sorry ringofan0309 is kind of getting annoying!